This past week in class we talked a lot about classroom
management. We also had a classroom management panel of teachers talk to us
about their philosophies on the topic. Anyone watching or participating in our
class discussion would quickly learn that we are not a quiet bunch about our
views. The questionable language that the teacher panel was using struck a
heated, yet very interesting, discussion in the class. What do the teachers really
mean by “these” students? Throughout the week I have been trying to figure out
what I want to write about, but I think I want to comment on these stereotypes
that the teachers were expressing and where new teacher’s opinions could be
established.
Like I
had previously mentioned in class, I went into CF with only the biased opinions
that my friends had told me about the school and the community, and all of their
views had been negative. Is this what it is like for teachers coming into CF?
They only have the biased opinions from coworkers they meet in the summer,
research they have done which would include learning about what happened in
2010, or only general statistics about the community and comparing it to other
cities. The teachers build these stereotypes in their heads before actually
meeting the students in the school. I also think that the teachers extend their
views that they establish one year onto the next year when the students are
completely different. As the year changes and a teacher gets new students in
their classes, the new students deserve a different view from the teacher than
their previously established views of their previous students.
If the
veteran teachers are telling the pre-service teachers (like my class!) that “these
students” do this or do that, then they are already contributing to the
construction of negative stereotypes. Luckily, my class recognized this and had
the chance to discuss what the teachers were actually trying to tell us. One
thing that I picked out of our classroom discussion after the teacher panel was
“racism [exists] under the disguise of words”. I think that is highly accurate.
The veteran teachers were contributing to this stereotyping by classifying the
students as “these students” or by classifying the students in CF as all Hispanic or all sub-par students. I may be talking in a circle now, but from the teachers classifying the students they are adding to a negative stereotype about students. Teachers shouldn't be stereotyping students like this, and they should not be adding to the stereotype!
Even
though the language of the panel was a bit questionable, I thought that they
had some good advice about classroom management for future teachers.
Establishing a relationship with your students, establishing the non-negotiables
early and being consistent with the rules were all pieces of good advice that I
picked up from the talk, outside of the language confusion.
I think these teachers contribute to the stereotyping of the students because this has been taught to them. When they speak to us, they are simply doing what was done to them years before. I've been in other classes where teachers do the same thing. I don't think it is a small problem with just a few teachers, I see them all doing it.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that some of the teachers at CF contribute to the negative stereotype that people have of the students at CFHS. I had heard these negative things before this semester as well. At work when I told my customers about our class I received this same "look". It was as if they were scared for me. It did make me nervous to go to class the first week but I am glad to have been able to tell these same customers that this experience has been very rewarding and in a way, I enjoy to prove them wrong. The students at this school are exactly like students in all other schools. I know I don't contribute to the negative stereotype that some people have about the students at this school and I wish that the teachers didn't contribute to it as well.
ReplyDelete