There is
so much to be said about the lessons that we learned in 407 this past week. By beginning
with a talk by Dr. Gallo, going to the topic of questions, and finishing with a
fishbowl activity of watching how teachers today are creating their lesson
plans, I know that I took away a lot of useful information. Just a few days later, I found that I was
thinking about the fishbowl more than anything.
Kim,
Bob, and Buddy had agreed to hold their planning time in our classroom so that
we could benefit and learn from watching them plan a lesson. I thought that, as
veteran teachers, Kim and Bob would go into the planning session already knowing
what they wanted to do and were going to check with Buddy, the Dean of
Pedagogy. I was quickly mistaken as each, Bob and Kim, came into the room with
two very different view points and had to work together to find common ground
in the lesson that would benefit all of the students. By the end of the session,
they had incorporated aspects from both teachers’ ideas to create a lesson plan
that would benefit all of the students including extra support for the students
in special education.
As Dean
of Pedagogy, Buddy became the person that would keep Kim and Bob in check and
making sure that the plans that they created for the class would align back to
the learning targets that they had established for that lesson. This sounds
like a great asset to have in a high school! Having that outside party to the
classroom would bring the teachers back into check when they create these
elaborate plans to make sure that the students are actually learning what they
need to learn! Why is it then that this position is so rare? Why is it that
CFHS sees the need for this position and budgets for it, and other schools don’t?
By using Buddy, a team effort is created to make sure that the students are the
focus and that learning will be happening.
I
enjoyed watching the group create a lesson plan. It cleared up some doubts I
was having in myself that because I was asking so many questions of my plans
and always changing things around, I wasn’t planning in the most efficient way.
I learned that even teachers, who have been in schools for years and years, are
having the same questions and mind flips that I have! It’s a great
reinforcement to see that I am doing something right by questioning and
changing. As pre-service teachers, the class and I should be exposed to
activities, panels, and observations that squash our fears or our
misconceptions about teaching. Actually watching teachers create their lesson
plan squashed some fears in me.
I agree that more schools should have the "Dean of Pedagogy" position and I think it would only benefit the school. Having a third "outside" person to bounce ideas off of would moderate the decision making process and help to keep the teachers on task (much like Buddy demonstrated). At the same time, his position keeps the planning non-confrontational. I can imagine having different views with a co-teacher (especially if we were newly formed partners) and feeling a power struggle between myself and the other teacher. By having Buddy assist the co-teachers, it is a way to think about what's best for the students rather than "your idea stinks".
ReplyDeleteWatching a lesson being planned was my favorite part of class! I'm so glad to have learned what a Dean of Pedagogy was. I can only wish to have one in the school that I teach at some day. However, I did learn some great things from Buddy in the 25 minutes we had with him. I really liked that he made sure that Bob and Kim connected everything they were planning back to the objectives. That is something we have learned in class and it is definitely one of the most important things we need to do while making our lesson plans. Since I don't have a Dean of Pedagogy available to me right now I think what I will do is write notes on my lesson plans, reminding myself to connect all the steps to the objectives. This way, I get in a habit of doing this and I don't get too carried away with the activity.
ReplyDelete